Key Considerations for Safe and Lawful Restraint Use
Last Resort Only
Restraint should only ever happen when everything else has been tried and hasn’t worked.
If de‑escalation, communication, space, or other preventative strategies can keep everyone safe, those should always come first. Restraint is the absolute last step, not a behaviour‑management tool.
Purpose
The only reason to use restraint is to stop someone from being seriously harmed — whether that’s the person themselves, someone nearby, or in some cases to prevent major damage that could lead to injury.
It should never be used to make someone comply, follow instructions, or manage behaviour that isn’t dangerous.
Legal and Policy Compliance
Any use of restraint must align with relevant legislation and guidance, such as:
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Mental Health Act 1983 (where applicable)
- Sector‑specific guidance (DfE, Ofsted, CQC)
- Restraint should be part of an agreed, risk‑assessed plan wherever possible.
Risks Involved
Physical restraint carries significant risks you should be aware of and this include:
- Physical injury.
- Psychological trauma.
- Increased distress or escalation.
- Risk of death, particularly in children and vulnerable individuals.
This is why regulators emphasise prevention, de‑escalation, and least restrictive practice.
Training
Staff must receive accredited, evidence‑based physical restraint training in the safe use of restrictive interventions.
This ensures they understand:
- Legal and ethical boundaries
- Medical risks
- Safe positioning and monitoring
- When to stop and seek help